On Wednesday, President Trump went on a tweeting spree exposing the fraud all over the country which took place during the mail in voting count…
Twitter and Facebook have both taken steps to prevent the spread of Trump’s tweets. Big tech has coordinated the biggest censorship campaign ever launched in history — and it’s target is the American people.
Even our own publication, the East Valley Post has been shadow banned on Google as of this morning for posting about Trump’s allegations of fraud.
That won’t stop us from reporting though, in fact the opposite. We know that the intent of censorship to begin with is the cultivation of a self-censoring society.
They are working to condition us to self-align our political beliefs with our particular establishment assigned identity class. You already see this taking place in China currently, where Silicon Valley companies like Google actively have worked to develop the Social Credit Score system.
After all, don’t you want to travel? Don’t you want to be able to get a good job, live in a good neighborhood, and have access to sports, shopping, and entertainment?
If so you now must ask, “Is it really worth that Google search of Hunter Biden’s email leak? Is it worth sharing that post of a Trump’s speech calling for unity? Is it worth liking that picture or video on Facebook?”
Even if it is positive content you want to share, if it contradicts the establish view of lets say, Donald J Trump being a racist and a threat to our democracy… then you better fall in line.
Isn’t it just easier to tune into that new PewDiePie video on YouTube, anyway? Maybe turn on the Monday night NFL game or binge watch a new HBO Max Original Series? There is absolutely no need for you to leave the comfort of uniform thinking, and risk your solid Social Credit standing.
It’s a subtle process and it’s happening here…
We saw Alex Jones get banned from social media, censored from app stores, etc. You could only post links about Alex Jones or infowars.com on social media if they were critical of him.
“Hey — that’s Alex Jones though!” You say, “He said some obviously wild things like the chemicals in the water that turn the frogs gay thing?”
But it’s the President of the United States of America, too. It’s the East Valley Post. It’s most conservative media. To be fair, it’s any view that contradicts the establishment view. I am sure many left-wing, anti-war, “military industrial complex” types get their content shadow banned as well.
The point is, Big Tech has repeatedly claimed to not be influencing elections and public opinion, when if fact the contrary is true. Big Tech is developing and deploying tools of mass censorship on the American people and doing so under a veil of secrecy that even Congress seems stumped to reform.
Listen to Tucker Carlson break it down further…
Big Tech’s coordinated suppression amounts to a ‘censorship cartel’…
Tucker on big tech trying to censor his show…
Rep. Jim Jordan: Big tech must face ‘consequences’ for censorship…
What it’s like to be a conservative in Silicon Valley…
Twitter CEO speaks out after tech giant suppresses NY Post’s Hunter Biden story…
Ted Cruz GRILLS Facebook & Twitter CEO over social media censorship…
Tucker: Big tech has launched an attack on your rights…
Tucker: Media embrace Big Tech censorship instead of pushing back…
Tucker: Big Tech censors dissent over coronavirus lockdowns…
Couric Admits She Edited Interview Of RBG, Cutting Justice Saying Anthem Kneelers Show ‘Contempt’ For America
- Katie Couric has admitted to editing out Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s controversial comments from her 2016 sit-down with the late Supreme Court Justice
- Couric writes that she was faced with a ‘conundrum’ while working on the story for Yahoo! News, in her scathing new memoir, Going There, released October 26
- The former Today show host reveals Ginsburg responded negatively when asked about people who kneel for the national anthem as a protest against racism
- The published story did include quotes from the justice calling the gesture ‘dumb and disrespectful’ but omitted more controversial remarks
- Ginsburg had also said that such protests showed ‘contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life’
- ‘…which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from…as they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,’ she added
- Couric claims that Ginsburg, who was 83 at the time, was ‘elderly and probably didn’t fully understand the question’
- She admits she ‘wanted to protect’ Ginsburg and felt that the issue of racial justice was a ‘blind spot’ for her
Katie Couric has admitted to ‘protecting’ Ruth Bader Ginsburg from public backlash by cutting out negative comments she made about people who kneel during the national anthem.
The former Today show host reveals in her new book that she let her personal political views influence her editing decisions after her interview with the late Supreme Court justice in 2016.
In new memoir, Going There, Couric writes that she edited out a part where Ginsburg said that those who kneel during the national anthem are showing ‘contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life.’
The published story, which Couric wrote for Yahoo! News in 2016, did include quotes from Ginsburg saying refusing to stand for the anthem was ‘dumb and disrespectful’, but omitted more problematic remarks.
But Couric writes in her memoir that she thought the justice, who was 83 at the time, was ‘elderly and probably didn’t fully understand the question.’
The anecdote is the latest controversial revelation to emerge from Couric’s book, which is set to be released October 26.
DailyMail.com previously revealed how the veteran news anchor brutally rips into her former colleagues, ex-boyfriends, and celebrities in the score-settling tome, which runs to 500 pages.
Couric, 64, writes that she always tried to keep her ‘personal politics’ out of her reporting throughout her career.
Biden’s Approval 10 Points Lower Than Obama’s At Same Point In Presidency
President Biden’s job approval currently sits 10 points lower than that of his former boss, President Barack Obama, at the same point in his presidency in 2009.
According to approval ratings averages calculated by RealClearPolitics (RCP), Obama’s approval rating on Oct. 11 during his first year in office sat at 53 percent with a disapproval rating of 40 percent.
During all of Obama’s eight years as president, Biden worked as his vice president.
It has been over 12 years since the two started their time in the White House, and Biden is now sitting at an RCP average approval rating of 43 percent with a disapproval rating of 52.3 percent.
The averages calculated by RCP are pulled from a variety of polls including ones done by Fox News, Gallup, Reuters/Ipsos, Rasmussen and Monmouth.
Biden’s approval rating has been steadily dropping since he took office in January as his administration has attempted to manage a variety of blunders from the chaotic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan to the record-smashing surge of illegal immigrants crossing the southern border.
Rasmussen: Growing Number of Voters Say Cheating Tainted the 2020 Election
Biden 2020 win ‘tainted,’ 56% say it was a cheater’s paradise
A growing number of likely voters believe that cheating tainted President Joe Biden’s 2020 win over former President Donald Trump, and even more feel that a key Democratic election reform scheme will increase fraud.
In the latest Rasmussen Reports survey, 56% of respondents said, “It’s likely that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, including 41% who say it’s ‘very likely.’”
That is a significant increase from April, when 51% said “Biden’s election was tainted by cheating.”
The change comes as Trump has continued to raise election integrity charges and as Democrats have tried to force through liberal election reforms and shut down GOP state voting reforms.
In the new survey, voters told Rasmussen that they are not sold on efforts by Biden and congressional Democrats to expand COVID-era voting by mail, believing it will “lead to more cheating in elections.”
The results are a rejection of sorts of key features in House and Senate election reform bills supported by Biden and given to Vice President Kamala Harris to sell nationally.
By a 65%-28% margin, likely voters told the polling outfit that they believe more mail-in voting options will boost cheating. That included a majority, 51%, who said it is “very likely” cheating will expand.
The survey is the latest to suggest that partisans remain divided on the issue, though 95% agree with the vague goal of ending election cheating.
Chicago Art Museum Fires Unpaid Volunteers For Being White
Iceland halts Moderna jabs over heart-inflammation fears
Middle-Class Migrants Fly to Mexico and Then Cross U.S. Border Illegally
Evidence shows ANTIFA being escorted into DC by police ahead of Jan. 6th MAGA Stop The Steal rally…
MSM COVER UP: Video shows BUSLOAD of ANTIFA infiltrating peaceful TRUMP PATRIOT PROTEST… FALSE FLAG EXPOSED!
President of Croatia: We will not be vaccinated anymore
Health3 weeks ago
President of Croatia: We will not be vaccinated anymore
Health2 weeks ago
India Govt. Declares Most Populated State Officially COVID Free After Widespread Use Of Ivermectin
Local News3 weeks ago
Laundrie neighbors reveal Brian’s haunting ‘normal’ life after returning home without Gabby
Health3 days ago
Taiwan death from COVID-19 vaccination exceeds death from COVID-19
Health1 week ago
US State With Highest Vaccination Rate Sees Record Surge In COVID Cases
Local News4 weeks ago
Gavin Newsom Wins In Blowout
Health2 weeks ago
DHS Secretary admits 1 in 5 migrants have an ‘illness’ after Trump claimed they’re bringing ‘contagious diseases’
Health2 weeks ago
Despite 95% Vaccination Rate, Harvard Experiences “Substantial Outbreak” of COVID