Connect with us


WARNING: Renowned World Virologist Warns Against Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine

WARNING about the Coronavirus Vaccine!

Renowned Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi warns against the Hastily Created Gene-Altering vaccine!



WARNING: Renowned World Virologist Warns Against Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine

In the following RAIR Foundation USA exclusively-translated video, German virologist Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi expresses deep suspicion of the vaccination development process in place for the Chinese coronavirus, which violates well-established scientific norms. The Doctor makes several very powerful points that should be considered by those touting a potential vaccine.

The former Emeritus Head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz, Germany explains that the scientific “standard” for vaccine creation is “four to five years.” The prominent physician dismisses the notion that a coronavirus vaccine so hasitily developed could be safe.

Coronavirus Mortality Rate Obscured

One of the most obvious points is that the vaccine is for an illness that has an incredibly low case fatality rate in Germany. “Among these 0 to 70 years, 0.7 percent died with and from COVID-19. 0.7 percent died,” he explains. But the real scandal is that these numbers are obscured from the public, in an apparant effort to make the disease appear more deadly than it actually is. Likewise, this author has looked for the mortality rate of the coronavirus in America by age and it is very difficult to find. “You won’t be able to find the answer, because you’ll only get an answer if you search the reports from the RKI [Robert Koch Institute] and calculate the number yourself.”

The doctor explains that the coronavirus is “about as dangerous as an influenza virus. A seasonal, moderate flu.” Doctor Bhakdi further explains that the vast majority of deaths are people who already have compromised health. As an individual over 70, the doctor explains that he is still not concerned, as he does not have co-morbidities. “I might be over 70, but I don’t have any pre-existing conditions, and if I wanted to, I wouldn’t die unless I threw myself down the stairs, out of desperation,” he said wryly.

As noted previously at RAIR, Dr. Deborah Birx in America stated during a press conference in April that “…if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19 death.” With that in mind, it is certainly not a stretch to be highly suspicious of the death toll of the virus. In addition, the CDC guidance for reporting cause of death, “death certifiers” are advised on “proper cause-of-death certification for cases where confirmed or suspected COVID–19 infection resulted in death.” (author emphasis) This guidance has not been retracted.

A ‘completely new kind of vaccine’

Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi makes an incredibly powerful statement while explaining that the vaccine being developed “isn’t a normal conventional vaccine, and it’s not like the flu vaccine.” He says that the vaccine is “gene-based,” and the way it works is “still unknown scientifically and medically.” While many people have fought against genetically modified food, the Virologist explains, “we’re [now] talking about a vaccination that genetically manipulates the human body, and apparently these same people have no concerns about it.”

The doctor explained very simply that all people have “lymphocytes,” the body’s natural defense against viruses, including the Flu. It is a basic “principle of immunology,” he explains. “I believe it has always worked and that’s the reason why we as adults are relatively well-protected,” Bhakdi said. “If you are under 70 and not seriously ill from anything else,” the lymphocytes will do their jobs.

However, if one uses the vaccine to “inject the gene of the virus,” the lymphocytes “won’t recognize that it is only the gene that was injected and not the virus.” The result, he explains, will be that the lymphocytes “will go there anyway and kill these cells.” Bhakdi continues: “That’s what we call an autoimmune reaction.”

As to the lastest leftist assertion that there are “increasing numbers of long-term consequences for corona patients,” Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi said: “It isn’t possible to form an opinion, because there are no data at all.”

Read The Dr. Bhakdi transcript below:

“Although from a scientific standpoint, the development of a vaccine usually takes at least four to five years. That’s the standard, scientifically. Now with Corona, suddenly it will be ready in few months and it’s supposed to be a safe vaccine. The Austrian health minister says in all seriousness we could have a safe inoculation as early as January.

So far, the mainstream media haven’t questioned that, and say, “Yes, yes, it will be relatively safe with relatively few side effects.”
Are politics and the media already completely corrupted by the pharmaceutical industry, Professor?

I don’t know, but what I don’t understand is the statement that the vaccine is so urgently needed.
Now I will ask the audience a question in return: Do you know how many people under the age of 70 have died from COVID 19? As a percentage? That means, out of 1000 people under 70 who were infected, how many died? You won’t be able to find the answer, because you’ll only get an answer if you search the reports from the RKI [Robert Koch Institute] and calculate the number yourself.

These figures are not available. So then I will tell you that if you calculate how many COVID-19 deaths there have been among the total number of people under the age of 70, it was about 185,000 under the age of 70 who were infected. That means that most of them were young and under 70, because the total number was 230,000. The rest were older than 70.

Among these 0 to 70 years, 0.7 percent died with and from COVID-19. 0.7 percent died. That means 99.3 percent did NOT die. Most of them were not seriously ill at all.

In America, it is now known that about 6% of the people were COVID victims, they are real victims. It was published by the CDC. The rest, the 94%, had serious pre-existing conditions. So, if you take Germany, well, let’s say 10% were real, then we are at 0.07% of real victims. That’s 99.93. Okay?

So, I can tell you I will never get vaccinated.

I might be over 70, but I don’t have any pre-existing conditions, and if I wanted to, I wouldn’t die unless I threw myself down the stairs, out of desperation.

I’m not saying that SARS-COV-2 is harmless. No. I never said that. It’s about as dangerous as an influenza virus. A seasonal, moderate flu. What I am saying is that the most at risk are those over 70 with severe pre-existing conditions. So, if you say, we should protect them, I’m right there with you and that’s good.

We have to do that. We should want to protect them. But how?

Then the question is: Should we vaccinate them? I would say yes, but these vaccines better be tested damned well for safety, especially because this vaccine will be used primarily on older sick people and not on young healthy people.

So, twelve months is not enough time for that. Not even five years. Certainly not. And that just applies to conventional vaccines.

What we are dealing with in Europe, in Germany, Austria, is a completely new kind of vaccine. This vaccine is gene-based. This isn’t a normal conventional vaccine, and it’s not like the flu vaccine.

The way this gene-based vaccine works is still unknown scientifically and medically.
The impact of which has a very high-risk potential. —This is also a very central point, of which I do not think many people are aware. For many years, we have experienced this massive protest movement against genetic manipulation in our food.

In particular, the Green Party has been fighting for years against genetically manipulated food coming onto the market, especially in Europe. So now we’re talking about a vaccination that genetically manipulates the human body, and apparently these same people have no concerns about it.

I can’t understand that either. I can’t understand that. And I don’t want to understand it. I don’t want to accept it. You can’t say, ‘Oh! This virus is so dangerous, that we now have to do away with everything or else it will wipe us all out.’

You know this gene-based vaccine. I’m going to tell you a little bit about it, because as I understand it, Mrs. Merkel has reserved 54 million doses of this gene-based vaccine from the British company. In Austria as well. Six million doses were ordered for a total population of eight million. —Yes.

How can they do that? How can they do that? And they even do it with our tax money to boot. And it’s not just that, because they advertise for this vaccination almost daily. They call it harmless. They call it safe.

Just this Tuesday, a few Austrian media outlets announced the latest gag: ‘The vaccination will be free!’ The government will carry the costs. I read that in the newspaper today. I saw that in the newspaper, yes. The government pays with our tax money, at least I think so; I don’t know if they have secret accounts or something somewhere.

So now getting back to our topic: When a virus produces a protein in one of our cells, it produces waste. It is like building a house, and there’s waste produced in the process. This waste is hung outside the door as a sign or placed in front of the door as garbage. This waste is recognized by lymphocytes, including killer lymphocytes, which we all have.

They recognize the waste of this coronavirus as coronavirus waste because these lymphocytes have met other coronaviruses. Maybe last year or the year before last. These lymphocytes have a long memory. I pointed out in the book that these killer lymphocytes are probably the reason why [we remain healthy], probably.

If you or I have or get a SARS-COV-2 infection, and it really goes into my cells, it reproduces itself. The waste produced by this process is put outside the door of my lung cell, and then this killer lymphocyte cell from previous years recognizes the diseased cells and kills the cell.
That’s how the fire is put out. The factory is destroyed and the viruses are no longer produced and the person recovers and is healthy again. That’s the mechanism; that’s the main mechanism of recovery with a SARS-COV-2 infection.

It’s the same in cases of flu infection, by the way. This is a principle of immunology. I believe it has always worked and that’s the reason why we as adults are relatively well-protected.

If you are under 70 and not seriously ill from anything else, the fires are practically always extinguished. On the other hand, if you’re foolish enough to inject the gene of the virus, and it goes somewhere else, where it does not belong, it will produce waste there. Then the killer lymphocytes won’t recognize that it is only the gene that was injected and not the virus.

It will go there anyway and kill these cells. That’s what we call an autoimmune reaction. How and where these autoimmune reactions will happen, nobody knows. Tests for that have never been done. The pharmaceutical industry never considered that something like that could happen.

If you go through the literature and examine what reactions the vaccine that have been sold caused, you’ll find a study from early August. They were in phase 2, and a relatively small number of English volunteers were vaccinated.

In 20% to 25% of the cases, the side effects were so extreme that people had enormous swelling, fever, chills, headache, aching limbs, muscle aches, and were so sick that they could not stand it.

So this is obviously a sign of how they are trying to manipulate us through the media. In that article from Tuesday, with the headline: ‘There should be a free vaccination’. There was also an interview with a pharma lobbyist who said the exact opposite and denied it.

She said all the previous vaccine tests had no serious side effects. I consider that reprehensible. Now I’m getting angry. That can’t be possible. That’s lying.

You have to read this study. It’s published in Lancet. OK? What the English did, in Oxford, because the side effects were so severe, from that point on, all the subsequent test subjects for the vaccine were given a high dose of paracetamol [acetaminophen].

That’s a fever-reducing painkiller. You know? An antipyretic painkiller. Paracetamol in high doses. And then… In response to the vaccination? —No. To prevent the reaction. That means they received the painkiller first and then the vaccination afterwards. Unbelievable.

This way they could say that the vaccine was well-tolerated. After that, in the following weeks and months, they managed to get the Indian government to announce that we would be conducting the next phase in India. Not just in India. In other places as well.

I believe 3,000 young people in India will allow themselves to be vaccinated with this gene-based vaccine, and I’m sure the result will be celebrated with a big “hurray!” and the claim that they tolerated it well.

So, ladies and gentlemen, do you want your mother or grandmother who is 70 or 75 years old with a pre-existing condition to receive such a vaccine? They can’t want that. Or would you do that to yourself as someone younger than 70 years old? Before you do, you have to get a shot of paracetamol so you won’t have side effects? What for? What for?

Let me tell you this: I won’t be able to upload this video within the next five days because if I did, it would deleted right away, for what I just said.

Professor, there’s one topic that is continually brought up: The Swedish method. The Swedish took a completely different path from most countries. One of very few. It is one of the only countries in the world that didn’t impose lockdowns. 85 percent of the Swedish population supported this method.

However, what the health authorities admit is that they didn’t pay enough attention to risk groups the first few weeks.

—Yes. The elderly and those living in nursing homes. They admit it. That’s also a general topic when Corona is being discussed. The risk group of people with pre-existing conditions and older people. What do you say in reaction to this whole discussion about the high-risk group of people over 65 or 70 years of age?

Over 70 years, not 65. At least over 70, with pre-existing conditions, please. Sure. That was the case. Sweden didn’t really do a good job protecting people in nursing homes and old folks’ homes.

There were several reasons why this was the case. Our Swedish friends tell us that many foreigners who work in these Swedish nursing homes were not able to speak proper Swedish.

They couldn’t read and understand all these rules, precautions, and didn’t follow them. That’s what Sweden admits as well.

The most important thing in the future, no matter whether it is the flu or Corona, is to regulate access and visits to these vulnerable people very strictly.

With a mask, yes, sure, why not?

Disinfected hands. Yes, that’s all right.

Principally these are measures that already had been applied to the flu. —Yes! —If you went to an old folks’ home and it was flu season, you also had to pay attention to these measures. —Yes.

That’s it. We say this clearly and concisely in the book. People don’t like that, and that’s why our videos are constantly being deleted. All this isn’t necessary.

Just stop it. Why not turn our attention to reasonable, important things?

Restore the economy and get the culture back on its feet.

Culture has been ruined. The schools — education has been ruined.

The elderly people are still lonely because they can’t have visitors.

This can’t be true. We have a relative, this is a personal story now—five of us weren’t allowed to visit him.

That’s not permitted. What is this nonsense?
The topic of collateral damage from serious illnesses, heart attacks, badly treated cancer patients, unemployment, mental illness leading to suicide. —Suicide. —This is now a taboo subject at this point.

Yes, but Mr. Steinmeier says we shouldn’t talk about it, because that would be irresponsible. Do you understand that?

You have… —This is so ridiculous and so crazy and so irresponsible from politicians. I’ll say it point-blank. Everyone’s trust in politicians has been lost. You simply can’t do this.
There’s another question we are often asked besides the number of the seriously ill among the dead.

As I have said already several times, fortunately the death toll is continuously decreasing. However, according to some media reports in the past few weeks, there are increasing numbers of long-term consequences for corona patients.

What is your opinion on that from a professional point of view? —From a professional point of view, it isn’t possible to form an opinion, because there are no data at all.

And no studies. If you want to study long-term effects, you will probably have to do it for a longer time. —That’s a matter of years. —Yes, my God, to start fantasizing now that there might be long-term consequences, that’s following this agenda of the Federal Ministry of the Interior.

You know the document that went viral in March of this year, from the Corona Committee in the German Interior ministry. A protocol was written on how to manage the crisis during a time of crisis.

The consensus was that fear had to be created. The first step in creating fear was by not counting or announcing how many died, because there would be too few.
Instead, only the number of the infected would be announced. Secondly, people, especially the elderly, had to be made to understand that without ventilation, death would occur by slow suffocation.

A drowning death.

To imagine suffocating slowly to death is one of the most horrible thoughts about death that someone could have. That stirs up fear. Then we have to tell the children that they will bring the disease to their parents and kill their parents and kill their grandparents. That’s how they control everyone.

And one last thing, buckle up, we have to talk about possible long-term damages, which are of course unknown. We can and must convey that since this is a new form of disease, we therefore cannot know if there are long-term consequences, but you can start to imagine all kinds of things. Now let me tell you something: after we read this, we were really angry and we’re still angry now.

These pathologists in Germany, who supposedly say, ‘That’s right, the virus goes here, there, and everywhere. The virus can go different places.’

All viruses that infect the respiratory system can also appear in many other organs. This has been known a long time. Even in the brain, but it does not mean that they are doing something there. The quantity is important. You know, having a few viruses here and there doesn’t mean they do anything at all. Before you can draw conclusions, You’d better have damned good data to back it up, and that takes years of research.

So please, don’t believe these fantasies. It could happen, but the probability that it WON’T happen is much higher.”


Iceland halts Moderna jabs over heart-inflammation fears



Iceland halts Moderna jabs over heart-inflammation fears

Iceland on Friday suspended the Moderna anti-COVID vaccine, citing the slight increased risks of cardiac inflammation, going further than its Nordic neighbors which simply limited use of the jabs.

“As the supply of Pfizer vaccine is sufficient in the territory … the chief epidemiologist has decided not to use the Moderna vaccine in Iceland,” said a statement published on the website of the Health Directorate.

This decision owed to “the increased incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination with the Moderna vaccine, as well as with vaccination using Pfizer/BioNTech,” the chief epidemiologist said in a statement.

For the past two months, Iceland has been administering an additional dose “almost exclusively” of the Moderna vaccine to Icelanders vaccinated with Janssen, a single-dose serum marketed by America’s Johnson & Johnson, as well as to elderly and immunocompromised people who received two doses of another vaccine.

This will not affect the vaccination campaign in the island of 370,000 inhabitants, where 88 percent of the population over 12 years old is already fully vaccinated.

Since Thursday, Sweden and Finland have also suspended the use of the Moderna vaccine but only for those under 30, because of a risk of inflammation of the myocardium, the heart muscle, and the pericardium, the membrane covering the heart.

Read more on Medical xPress

Continue Reading


More Than Half Million Healthcare Workers Quit Jobs In August



More Than Half Million Healthcare Workers Quit Jobs In August

More than half a million healthcare workers quit their jobs in August amid a surge of Delta variant COVID-19 cases, according to a report from the Labor Department.

In a job openings and labor turnover survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Tuesday, data showed that in August the number of people who quit increased to 4.3 million — the highest on record since December 2000.

About 534,000 healthcare workers quit their jobs in August, up from about 404,000 during the same month in 2020.

The numbers suggest healthcare workers handed in their resignations in droves — fueling ongoing concerns of staffing shortages — as the highly contagious Delta variant caused COVID-19 hospitalizations to soar across the U.S. over the summer, Newsweek reported.

The number of people who quit also rose the most in the South and Midwest, the government said, the two regions with the worst COVID-19 outbreaks in August, ABC News reported.

About 892,000 people quit their jobs in hotels, bars, and restaurants, up about 21% from July and almost twice as many as in August 2020. About 721,000 Americans quit retail jobs.

On Friday, the government said job gains were weak for a second straight month in September, with only 194,000 jobs added, though the unemployment rate fell to 4.8% from 5.2%. Friday’s hiring figure is a net total, after quits, retirements, and layoffs are taken into account, ABC News reported.

Tuesday’s report showed hiring slowed in August, while the number of jobs available fell to 10.4 million, from a record high of 11.1 million in July. The largest decreases in job openings included healthcare and social assistance, the figures showed.

The data is not likely to have picked up the impact of vaccine mandates, Newsweek noted.

Read more on Newsmax

Continue Reading


FDA Authorizes First E-Cigarette, Cites Benefit For Smokers



FDA Authorizes First E-Cigarette, Cites Benefit For Smokers

For the first time, the Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday authorized an electronic cigarette, saying the vaping device from R.J. Reynolds can help smokers cut back on conventional cigarettes.

E-cigarettes have been sold in the U.S. for more than a decade with minimal government oversight or research. Facing a court deadline, the FDA has been conducting a sweeping review of vaping products to determine which ones should be allowed to remain on the market.

The agency said in September it had rejected applications for more than a million e-cigarettes and related products, mainly due to their potential appeal to underage teens. But regulators delayed making decisions on most of the major vaping companies, including market leader Juul, which is still pending.

Tuesday’s decision only applies to Vuse’s Solo e-cigarette and its tobacco-flavored nicotine cartridges. The agency said data from the company showed the e-cigarette helped smokers significantly reduce their exposure to the harmful chemicals in traditional cigarettes.

While the products can now be legally sold in the U.S., the FDA stressed they are neither safe nor “FDA approved,” and that people who don’t smoke shouldn’t use them.

Launched in 2013, Vuse Solo is a rechargeable metallic device that’s shaped like a traditional cigarette. The FDA said it rejected 10 other requests from the company for other flavored products. The agency is still reviewing the company’s request to sell a menthol-flavored nicotine formula.

“Today’s authorizations are an important step toward ensuring all new tobacco products undergo the FDA’s robust, scientific premarket evaluation,” said Mitch Zeller, director of the FDA’s tobacco center, in a statement.

“The manufacturer’s data demonstrates its tobacco-flavored products could benefit addicted adult smokers who switch to these products – either completely or with a significant reduction in cigarette consumption.”

E-cigarettes first appeared in the U.S. around 2007 with the promise of providing smokers with a less harmful alternative to smoking traditional tobacco cigarettes. The devices heat a nicotine solution into a vapor that’s inhaled.

But there has been little rigorous study of whether e-cigarettes truly help smokers quit. And efforts by the FDA to begin vetting vaping products and their claims were repeatedly slowed by industry lobbying and competing political interests.

In recent years, the vaping market grew to include hundreds of companies selling an array of devices and nicotine solutions in various flavors and strengths. But the vast majority of the market is controlled by a few companies including Juul Labs, which is partially owned by Altria, and Vuse.

Vuse is the No. 2 vaping brand in the U.S. behind Juul, accounting for about a third of all retail sales. Its parent company R.J. Reynolds sells Newport, Camel and other leading cigarettes.

A company spokesperson said in a statement that the FDA decision confirms “that Vuse Solo products are appropriate for the protection of the public health, underscoring years of scientific study and research.”

The company said it is still awaiting an FDA decision on its more popular vaping device, Vuse Alto.

To stay on the market, companies must show that their products benefit public health. In practice, that means proving that adult smokers who use the products are likely to quit or reduce their smoking, while teens are unlikely to get hooked on them.

Kenneth Warner, a tobacco expert at the University of Michigan’s school of public health, said the news was a positive step for reducing the harms of smoking. But he lamented that only a vaping device backed by a Big Tobacco company was able to win the FDA’s endorsement.

“The demands the FDA places on companies filing these applications are so extraordinary difficult to meet that only those with huge resources and personnel — in terms of scientists, lawyers, researchers — are able to file successfully,” said Warner.

He said smaller companies and vape shops should have a separate path to get their products authorized.

The FDA declared underage vaping an “epidemic” in 2018 and has taken a series of measures aimed at the small cartridge-based devices that first sparked the problem, including limiting their flavors to tobacco and menthol. Separately, Congress raised the purchase age for all tobacco and vaping products to 21.

Survey data collected earlier this year showed Vuse was the second-most popular e-cigarette brand among high schoolers who vape, preferred by 10%. Juul was the fourth-most popular e-cigarette, cited by less than 6%.

Read more on AP News

Continue Reading